The two main types of campaign strategies are grassroots and traditional. A grassroots strategy is one where the candidate relies on people in their local community to work for them, such as canvassing door-to-door or organizing meetings with residents. This type of campaign can be very effective if there is an issue that resonates strongly with voters in the area, but it may not be best to use this type of approach if the issues at stake don’t resonate deeply with every potential voter. Traditional campaigns require more financial resources which means they typically rely on more media advertising rather than face-to-face interactions with voters.
Grassroots campaign strategies
A grassroots campaign strategy is one where the candidate relies on people in their local community to work for them, such as canvassing door-to-door or organizing meetings with residents. This type of campaign can be very effective if there is an issue that resonates strongly with voters in the area, but it may not be best to use this type of approach if the issues at stake don’t resonate deeply with every potential voter.
What is traditional campaign strategies?
Traditional campaigns require more financial resources which means they typically rely more on media.
A traditional campaign strategy is one where the candidate relies on larger groups and organizations to work for them, such as large volunteer networks or media campaigns. This type of campaign can be very effective if there is an issue that resonates strongly with voters in a wider area but it may not be best to use this type of approach if the issues at stake don’t resonate deeply with every potential voter.
Pros and cons of grassroots campaign strategies
Pros of Grassroots campaign strategies
*While grassroots strategies are usually more time-consuming than traditional types, they generally have lower costs involved which makes them good options for smaller races when money isn’t available or accessible. They also allow candidates who might otherwise feel excluded from politics due to lack of financial resources or family connections into the political process by providing opportunities for personal involvement like canvassing, phone banking, or running for office.
Grassroots for Hire: Public Affairs Consultants In American Democracy (Business and Public Policy) on Amazon!
Cons of grassroots campaigning
Grassroots campaigning requires more time to establish. It can be more difficult to get funding for a grassroots campaign,
Pros and cons of traditional campaign strategies
Pros of traditional campaign strategies
*On the other hand, a traditional campaign strategy might be best for candidates who have support from large organizations and can rely on publicity campaigns to get their message across. They are also great options for higher-profile races like presidential elections where there is plenty of media coverage available which means that less time needs to be spent on advertising. However, this type of approach may not work as well in local areas with fewer resources since it relies heavily on concentrated efforts rather than grassroots involvement at all levels of society.
Cons of traditional campaigning
More expensive types of campaigns are usually reliant on media coverage or advertising instead of grassroots involvement, which limits the chance for everyone in society to contribute.
The two types of strategies for a campaign both have benefits and drawbacks depending on what you are trying to do and how much money you will need if any. Grassroots approaches generally require more time to establish but are cheaper and give everyone a chance to contribute. Traditional types of campaigns rely on more financial resources, which means they typically require more media coverage or advertising instead of grassroots involvement at all levels for society. Which type you choose will depend on your situation- if it is an important issue that resonates with voters in the area then a traditional campaign may be better, but if there isn’t much interest from people locally then grassroots types might work best.
When to use a grassroots campaign strategy?
A grassroots campaign strategy relies on people in the local community to work for you so it is best if there are issues that resonate deeply with voters in your area. You should also know how many resources and time you have before deciding which type of campaign to use as conventional types require more financial resources, such as media buys or canvassing door-to-door.
How do I get started?
To set up a grassroots campaign, start by identifying all of the potential members of the team who can help out—these might be friends from school or family members who live near where they plan to run their campaigns. Use this list of contacts when determining what types of events will need volunteers and then ask everyone on that list whether they can help.
What types of events will need volunteers?
Events that are organized in-person with the local community, like canvassing door-to-door or organizing meetings with residents, require a lot of people to be successful so they’re not very scalable unless you have an army of supporters ready for action! Online outreach is also important but there’s less manpower needed because it doesn’t involve as many physical interactions–the time commitment from each volunteer is minimal and all online communication happens on social media platforms such as Facebook. So if your campaign relies heavily on being able to talk face to face about issues then focus more on in-person activities than online forms.
When to use a traditional campaign strategy?
A traditional campaign works better if you’re trying to reach out broadly through different types of mediums. This is a very expensive type of campaign so it’s not recommended if you’re an underdog and don’t have the financial resources to take on this approach.
What types of events are good for traditional campaigns?
Doesn’t work well with: Events that require physical interactions. Doesn’t work as broadly as other types of media because more people need to be involved in person. More costly than online activities. Highly recommend if you’re looking to reach out widely through various mediums such as social media platforms or TV ads before election day since the cost can add up quickly.
Examples of grassroots campaigns
- Barack Obama’s grassroots campaign in 2008 where he ran a simple, personal and efficient campaign by utilizing social media platforms such as Facebook to rally support.
- Bernie Sanders’ 2016 Presidential Campaign was also successful due mostly to the use of grassroots tactics which helped him get his message out without spending much money on traditional types of advertising.
Examples of traditional campaigns
- Hillary Clinton’s 2016 Presidential campaign was a traditional and expensive type of campaign. It consisted mostly of TV advertising, which can be costly to run on a nationwide scale.
- Mitt Romney 2012 presidential Campaign: $150 million in television ads versus Obama’s $100 million is an example where the traditional types of campaigns outmatched their competitors in terms of money spent.
Conclusion
Grassroots campaign strategies are a perfect way to use volunteers for events that require the help of people who have an interest in your cause. One example is volunteering at a walkathon and being able to get information about their event from the perspective of someone on foot. A grassroots strategy would be great for any type of event where you need more than just professional speakers or celebrity appearances, but also want people invested in your message as well.
Traditional campaigns, like advertisements or public relations campaigns, can work too; however, they don’t always provide the same level of engagement with potential supporters. Which approach should you choose? That’s up to you! Use this article as a guide and consider what type of campaign strategies to use.
